Mini Book Review #2: ‘Seventy-Eight Degrees of Wisdom’

51Taa5Vl3FL._SX311_BO1,204,203,200_

Review: Seventy-Eight Degrees of Wisdom by Rachel Pollack.

On a scale of ‘Buy it, Borrow It or Burn it.’ I recommend: Buy It. This is the only book you’ll ever need for tarot. Well, maybe one of two.

Divination is not the only reason to read tarot cards. It helps me avoid writer’s block. Reading the cards is essentially telling a story; a story that at one time had an oral tradition. Tarot is an illustrated version of the ‘hero’s journey.’ Rachel Pollack’s book discusses useful interpretations of the cards. It’s not a bullet list posted on social media that allow the querent the ability to choose the one description they like best. Her explanations detail the meaning of the cards based on history, imagery, and symbolism.

My preferred method for reading the cards is a three card layout. Three cards in a row – the ‘first’ is the past, the ‘second’ is the present, and the ‘third’ is the future. If one is reading the cards truthfully, they will recognize their past and their present. The future outcome, if one remains on their current path, should be apparent. After I read the individual cards, I look at them as a whole like a panoramic view. I look for the similarities in the cards, which may allude to a larger meaning.

The world is full of symbols and messages, and our ancestors knew how to read them. You may want to pause and take a look.

 

Mini-review of ‘A Ghost Story’

Ghost review (2)

Another film to hate or love. “A Ghost Story” (2017) is streaming on Amazon Prime this month. It received mixed reviews on IMDB. This is not a horror film. The director demonstrates the passage of time in a series of mundane scenes about everyday life as witnessed by a ghost. One reviewer summed it up as “imagine a joke that takes 90 minutes to tell.” The ending is oddly satisfying, but this film is slow.

Having lost family members, I understood the expressions of grief as depicted by Rooney Mara. She is a talented actress that conveys strong emotion with small actions, but time is the star of this film. It dominates every scene. The trouble is time doesn’t have any lines. The dialogue (in English) is almost nonexistent except for one passionate monologue about the insignificance of man in the universe. Well, we’ve heard that before, dude.

The deceased husband (played by Casey Affleck) was a composer of electronic music. Too bad his music and time weren’t coupled throughout the film. I kept thinking about ambient videos, which I enjoy, and how the film could have experimented with that concept. Literally, it could have been a soundtrack of life. It’s a shame. The theme song is worth listening even if you skip the film (see below).

The film is shot from the perspective of the ghost and it offers one interpretation of the afterlife. I’ve often wondered what happens to a loved one after death. I’ve heard that sometimes, a ghost will remain when there’s unfinished business. Does the same thing happen when a film doesn’t quite reach its promise?


Mini-review of ‘The Love Witch’

or worse.
Stills from ‘The Love Witch.’

I like odd films and this month, ‘The Love Witch’ is available on Amazon Prime. It’s a tribute to kitsch horror films of the sixties. The user reviews on IMDB are split. Some people loved it while others hated it; very few were neutral. Frankly, I have no desire to watch it again, but I’m not annoyed that I watched it once.

The film is beautifully shot and duplicates the technicolor look associated with sixties horror films. Too bad the script lacks a sense of humor. If it did, I missed the jokes. The film might have worked better if it had a few intentional laughs aka dark humor. The writer/producer/director (all one person) implied that ‘Love Witch’ carried a feminist theme, but the delivery was too intense for me. I don’t watch this genre for its social meaning.

I wasn’t thrilled with the dark depiction of witches either, having known several (male and female) who were focused on light, love and the healing arts. The writer studied the craft for the film, but her takeaway was more 1660’s, less 1960’s. Definitely not the third millennium. The film could have focused on a strong female character like the cheated-upon wife. I won’t spoil it, but Trish could fight.

Sigh, I just didn’t get this film, and I wanted to. You may like it or not. Be warned, it’s not a date film, there is frontal nudity, and the ending is ‘meh.’ But if you have Prime, it’s ‘free.’

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑